Subject	I could be wrong (n/m)
Posted by	Guapo on July 24, 2008 at 10:15 PM
	This message has been viewed 118 times.
In Reply To	I was of the impression that all newer JWT chips posted by ZLover4Life on July 24, 2008 at 10:10 PM
Message
Follow Ups	Can anyone decypher this JWT chip - DualZ (SF) 21:46:50 07/24/08 90-92 300ZX Turbo CAL MT (n/m) - Guapo 21:50:47 07/24/08 lol, 2nd (n/m) - Ahmed (Chicago) 21:51:34 07/24/08 Re: 90-92 300ZX Turbo CAL MT - DualZ (SF) 21:56:44 07/24/08 Re: Re: 90-92 300ZX Turbo CAL MT - SactoTodd 21:59:09 07/24/08 yes, yes, yes, no (i don't believe on the 90-92) - Guapo 22:07:30 07/24/08 I was of the impression that all newer JWT chips - ZLover4Life 22:10:04 07/24/08 I could be wrong (n/m) - Guapo 22:15:20 07/24/08 *gasp!* (n/m) - RSR 09:45:03 07/25/08 I know. (n/m) - Guapo 09:51:48 07/25/08 It depends on the program date. You'd have to email Ben at - Eric(NJ) 22:19:04 07/24/08 Re: Can anyone decypher this JWT chip - huey24nissan(NC) 23:04:37 07/24/08 96 looks nothing like that. (n/m) - Fast300 01:20:16 07/25/08 The sticker on the Eprom says C27 (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 01:44:32 07/25/08 Just call JWT you will find your answer. (n/m) - Raiders3986 00:40:42 07/25/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.